Martin Green wants to kill us all when we’re old

Governement advisor, Martin Green, wants assisted suicide legalised.

The Human Rights Act is designed to prevent the idea of state sponsored killings, whether these be for social, economic or political reasons.

This is nothing more than cost cutting: killing pernsioners will save money.

The idea that public opinion s in favour of it is facile. The people who will be affected will be the old, infirm, mentally ill and disabled babies. Of course at first it will be restricted, in theory, to those who truly wish to die but cannot do it themselves. Of course this will be the thin end of the wedge. Once the idea that people can be killed because they are old or ill takes hold it will develop into pressure on those in that position to do us all a favour and opt for premature death. It will strengthen the discriminatory behaviour (of which this idea is simply a part) of “the people” against the most vulnerable in our society and will shame us all.

Our prisons are now more hospitable places than our old folks homes or foster homes. But why not just kill all of them? Put them out of their misery.

It wouldn’t be long before one could make application to a court to kill the doting auntie who has a tidy nest egg. The court’s test would be something like the adoption test applied to parents with kids in care: would a reasonable auntie of sound mind and/or body consent to her own death?

The whole idea is a blatant abuse of human rights in the making.

If this jerk off wants to live somewhere that people are killed for being a nuisance why doen’t he go and live in Libya or China or Russia or some other soulless place.

People might think that whingers like Terry Pratchett and that irritating MS woman should be able to kill themselves if they want to. Well thay can, they just don’t want to. So what makes people think that anyone really wants to die unless the are cracked in the head?

Terry Pratchett must be one of the most selfish people around. Campaigning for something that will inevitably lead to mass executions of the old, disabled and mentally ill.

People in his position who know they will get to a point where thay will be mentally incompetent and physically unable to kill themselves should do it when they can. That’s their right and the only circumstance in which wilful killing should be legal except in self defence or time of war. Suicide is legal and that’s all that should be. “Assisted” suicide is murder. Simple as that.

It never ceases to amaze me that purportedly intelligent men (mainly) continue to argue that the diminution of human rights in the UK is a laudable aim, indeed according to the spanking goose steppers who advocate it, essential. Such attitudes are met with jaw dropping incredulity in the rest of Europe and make us all look pretty stupid.

The Human  Rights Act simply incorporates the Convention into our law at an earlier stage. This prevents the legislature, judiciary and parliament from abusing our human rights at an earlier stage. It is not possible to opt out of it at all.

The Act and the Convention are there to prevent bullying, discrimination, torture and state killings. It protects our rights to fair trials and free elections and our right to have a family life.  Of course practical jurisprudence is almost always going to involve looking at difficult or cutting edge cases. I agree that some of these deportation cases seem absurd, but perhaps the Government should seek clarification from the Supreme Court on more of these cases or simply amend the HRA to clarify the law. Indeed perhaps they should tighten immigration law more generally and seek some sort of recognition from the rest of Europe that we are a small island that can only take so much immigration.

Of course the goose steppers and spankers are always going to flag up cases that on the face of it are absurd and misrepresent them to put forward their own agenda.

Perhaps elected Judges might do a better job, they seem to in the US.

The HRA won’t be repealed. Get used to it dude.

Idiotic Judges Victimise Freedom Fighters

Freedom Fighters Jordan Blackshaw, 20, and Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan, 22, have both been jailed for expressing an opinion on Facebook. The opinion being that there should be a show of militant direct action against whatever it was they were pissed off about.

Four years? The attention seeker who sentenced them needs his head examined. They didn’t even have a criminal record and no riot actually happened.

Recorder of Chester Elgin Edwards has created two martyrs and sent a clear signal that political sentencing is to be the norm. Apparently the Judges have been told they can ignore the law, i.e. the sentencing guidelines, to effectively abuse the human rights of these two men.

The “rebels” in Lybia, the “dissidents” in China, and the “opposition forces” in Iran are heroes. But in the UK our own homegrown freedom fighters are persecuted in kangaroo courts.

Anyway we’d all better be careful about what we say about these Judges. They’re perfect you know.

Ever heard of Roland Freisler?

UK Judges make Roland Freisler look intelligent

Give it time they’ll start shouting their heads off in court. Especially if their political masters tell them to. That and hopping around the court room like Skippy on acid. The way in which some career minded, supposedly politically neutral judges have hijacked the headlines and sought to curry favour with whoever is pulling their strings is outrageous. If they want to be Tory politicians they should resign, stand for election and rant in Parliament. Or do what T.H.E. Ranter does and get a blog.

The brave young freedom fighters out on the streets these last few nights have had their brave efforts at being heard hijacked by the few mindless thugs who indulged in pointless violence.

The killings are a tragic distraction from the fact that the youth of this country have shamed their elders. Huddled in their cramped terraced houses, tiny semis and flats the crushed and demoralised middle cowered while their kids did something.

It’s futile to argue that this insurrection was “just criminality”. This is specious cant. It is also unintelligent. Many folk, older folk like me, will secretly agree that these young folks have a point. And we all know it’s not just “social housing” residents or some mythical underclass. Many of these brave youngsters risked jobs and careers to protest at the blatant corruption and greed at the heart of government.

These political protests were organised, planned and effective. The police might manage to lock up a couple of thousand of them but the problem is there’s a couple  of million more.

They cannot afford a house, they cannot afford education, they cannot get jobs. All of these problems faced by the “youth” is caused by the greed of Cameron and his buddies. Artificial measures to inflate house prices have destroyed the banking sector and employment. Why? To garner votes from the voters who are too idiotic to realise that houses make no money. Production and work does that.

These kids want to work to buy houses and have families. As it stands they cannot do any of that because of the greed of the older generation. They know voting is pointless. So what’s left? Militant direct action. And it works.

Godd luck to these brave young freedom fighters who shame our generation and thew supine “squeezed middle” who put up with whatever crap the corrupt political classes shovel their way.

The best the fools can come up with is hysterical ranting about “stripping” them of their council, sorry, social house, and stopping their benefits. Twitter, Facebook and text messaging has liberated the young. It is the only thing we’ve done for them and it’s biting us on the arse.

Good for them.