David Cameron - The Trendy Vicar

No, not really. The last Tory government got turfed out for being corrupt and fiddling. Now we know the boss of the “New” Conservatives is dodgy as well. So nothing changes. Let’s face it if the Telegraph hadn’t forked out £300,000.00 to rubbish the Labour Party The Trendy Vicar wouldn’t be paying back the money. The Telegraph definitely thought that they would destroy the Labour Party with the sleaze but it has affected the Tories more. People have long memories and don’t forget dodgy MPs. It won’t take much to remind them of John Major et al. The public aren’t as stupid as The Telegraph thinks, they know the difference between back handers and an expenses fiddle or a tax dodge. Most of them would, or more likely are, fiddle a little bit at work as it is. And they’d all like to be in the position of needing an accountant to help them to minimize their tax liability. Taking bribes most of them wouldn’t do. So the Telegraph has shot itself in the foot. By trying to damage Labour they have fatally wounded the Trendy Vicar David Cameron, his halo has slipped, his cassock is ripped and he cannot hide his Eton Chump background. But with pea brains like Simon Heffer and Boris Johnson on the team what do you expect?

The Daily Telegraph must be kicking themselves, Gordon Brown is stronger than before the scandal, he’s got a shot of winning the next election and managed to ditch most of the New Labour Blairites as well. He’s got a year to push through PR and make sure MPs cannot do outside work.  Given most Tory MPs do outside work (not to mention the crooks in the House of Lords) he couldn’t have done a better job of consolidating his own position. Of course he might lose the election, but he only needs a swing of about 5% and he’s looking at a Lib-Lab pact and an elected House of Lords and five years of a left wing government. The Tories will be fatally wounded and Cameron will be skulking back to the vicarage and a millionaire lifestyle, no need to pretend to be a grockle anymore.

No wonder Prince Charles is politicing in the background, it’ll be an elected president next time. Who’d vote for Charlie?

Exactly.

No one. Well, maybe Lord Soames and a few other sycophants. So he might get into four figures. So what?

Tags: politics, prince charles, proportional representation, The Trendy Vicar

David Cameron’s anti-German “joke” is racist?

Some would definitely say it is. I do not think he’s a racist, but if he is playing the racist card he’s played it well. It’s a finesse play. He can’t use the “N” word or the “P” word but he can parody the old Basil Fawlty routine, but without the self deprecating irony that makes that scene in Fawlty Towers so funny, and so British. Back in the fifties the Tories had a slogan : “If you want a “N” word for a neighbour vote Liberal or Labour”. Unbelievable but true I’m afraid.

David Cameron may have given himself away as a classic public school boy chump: a bit dim, cheated his way through Eton on dad’s money, got a job through dad’s friends, a bit boorish and loud, can’t hold his liqour, and doesn’t like anything or anyone that’s not English, or his understanding of what English is anyway. Failed in the city so thought he’d better dodge into the Tory party and cheat his way to the top: back stabbing, dishing out favours, playing on his chumpish and trendy vicar image.

The Trendy Vicar, more tea?

But I think it’s more subtle than that. He’s worried about UKIP and the BNP splitting the Tory vote and letting the Liberals and Labour in by the back door. So he’s played the racist and anti-European card in one hand. Take the piss out of the Germans and say they will scrap ID cards. But all the while he knows this is Tory policy too. He’s already said he’s going to scrap ID cards so we know he’s dead keen on it. He’ll blame Labour for signing “unbreakable contracts” in much the same way Tony Blair kept to Tory spending plans in his time. We all kinow Tories are spankers and they like control more than Labour. But they won’t have a referendum on Europe, even though they say they’ll have one. They like Europe, even though they say it’s crap.

They lie. But then so do Labour. We’d probably find UKIP, the BNP and The Liberals lie as well if they ever get a chance to prove it. So who to vote for in England? the Scottish Nationalists of course. They need to put candidates in every constituency and have ridiculous policies for the English, like: a referendum on Europe, banning the bomb, legalising all drugs, stopping all immigration except from within the British Isles. Split all the votes in other words, it would certainly help Scotland if England/Britain had a hung House of Commons.

 Be a bit of a wacky wheeze as The Chump might say.

Tags: David Cameron, Political Comment, Public School Boys, The Chump

David Cameron Rejects Electoral Reform

Predictably David “The Chump” Cameron has rejected proportional representation. He was hardly likely to vote for permanent opposition was he? As predicted by T.H.E. Ranter here on this very blog PR has now become a hot political issue. New Labour will disappear without it and that’s a fact. Brown has a chance to sack all the expenses cheats from cabinet and government and have a team of squeaky clean ministers. Cameron cannot do the same.

The Tories were corrupt in government and are corrupt in opposition. The chump Cameron is now wittering on about Europe, through William “baseball cap” Hague, the putative saviour of the pound and doomed anti-European. The Tories have to take on UKIP on their own ground and become overtly xenophobic and racist whilst paying lip service to equality for women. Bill Cash a feminist? Har de ha ha! Not likely is it? Unless thieving thousands for his daughter is feminist. This is Cameron’s problem: the worst thieves are all rich, fat and male Tories. They all seem anti-European, anti-poor, anti-women, anti-poofter, anti-everything except their own wallets.  

Don’t get me wrong I can see that Labour are useless, but remember the Tories, they were even worse and haven’t changed one jot in opposition. Do you really want a pair of Etonian twits running the place? These private school dimwits are dim for a reason: private schools are rife with cheating. They get copies of the exams and the teachers help the kids do their assessed work. They have to as most guarantee results and the teachers get paid bonuses for results. The upshot is that you have a new elite class of confident idiots who cheated their way into the legal, medical and financial professions. Now you know why the credit crunch happened: they can’t do maths because they all cheated.

As for the Liberal democrats, Thingy Clegg seems okay but no one takes him seriously: he has no presence. Vince Cable values his status as plausible pundit too much to get dirty enough to take on the leadership and thingy Huhne fiddled his expenses to get a trouser press!

Now if the Scottish Nationalists had a sense of humour and some common sense they’d put up a few MPs in the North of England with the aim of expanding their territory. They seem to be honest at least and they stand up for the average Scot, I’d vote for them anyday over the jerks in England. Even Plaid Cymru would do a better job of it.

I see Prince Charles is going to France. Sticking his nose in now he is. How many votes did he or his mum get then? None.

Tags: News, Political Comment, politics

Tragic loss of a child

It’s impossible to understand the depth of hurt and the strength of loss, the feelings of grief and confusion that the bereft parents of Ivan Cameron must feel.

T.H.E. Ranter has expressed, in the past, harsh criticisms of David Cameron. But one cannot but admire the obvious love he has for his kids. Ivan was lucky to have a Mum and Dad like David Cameron and his wife. He is an example to all fathers and one that is not easy to emulate.

Deepest sympathies and condolences.

Don’t give up, keep faith, you’ll see him again in Heaven.

RIP Tony Hart, a man who brought art to millions, an overlooked hero of our age.

He’ll be greatly missed by millions of us.

Cheers Tony.

Tags: Tony Hart

Ed Balls. Now what a turd he is.

It’s obvious that baby p’s death is a form of manslaughter. Why aren’t the Police involved? Well because it’s public sector worker’s at fault of course. And we all know that the Labour Party doesn’t accept that public sector workers ever do anything wrong, and should never be sacked, ever, for anything.

So, in a way, the Labour Party are protecting baby killers. They are definitely protecting that NHS quack doctor who refused to examine the baby: because he came from a chav background. But then a lot of quacks are like that. They seem to get away with murder these quacks. I mean the McCanns had protection from Gordon Brown, not that they’re murderers or anything, no they just abandon children - ah well that’s okay then. Why didn’t they have a lie detector test though? Mmm.

But then MPS are just as snotty as quacks, and dentists. Think they’re a cut above. But a child killer, beater, neglecter. Well whatever - they’re all pervs to me. Quacks or not. Everyone involved in the Baby P case who didn’t protect him should be in prison.

But what will happen?

Nothing that’s what, an inquiry, a multi agency task force of bollocks. What does a multi agency task force do? Well they put their heads together to cover up for the racist, prejudicial spunk stains who let that baby die. That’s what.

So the merry widower is sixty. So what?

He’s a thick as a brick and useless. He gets preferential treatment from the taxman and is worth billions that we don’t know about. But then so is the Queen.

The Prince’s Trust? Bollocks is what. Prejudiced, class ridden privileged rubbish.

He’s going to be head of state and he’s dense. He should have to get elected.

Even Rupert Murdoch thinks so, and the Sun. So it must be right.

Charlie being sixty is just an excuse for all the gushig sycophants to waffle on about what a great bloke he is, how great Camilla is and how the public all agree.

Like T. H. E. Ranter says, we live in a quasi-monarchical democracy. We have an unelected head of state that will always be white and german/greek, always be a man (barring accidents) and always be eighty plus. We have a Prime Minister who has no real power and who isn’t elected either. We’d be better off in Saudi Arabia.

David Cameron and Gordon Brown today traded insults over the corpse of Baby P. This confirms The Ranter’s view that all Members of Parliament are scabs. Full of puss, sputum and bile. Self serving two faced nonces with their fingers in the till. Baying and cawing over the death of a baby.

Now for those of you who don’t know Baby P was let down by the same Social Services Department that let Victoria Climbie die.

The same NHS useless hospital, class prejudiced quacks and money grubbing fat arsed nurses let him down as well. A useless NHS quack doctor refused to examine the baby because he was crying. Eh? Now this absolute piece of pond life needs to be struck off for life, fined the maximum, prosecuted for manslaughter and given life without parole.

What will happen though? Bugger all.

Useless social workers and police saw the baby sixty times, SIXTY TIMES, they should all be fired, prosecuted and sent to prison and lose everything they have. We should have a witch hunt and these pompous, useless, prejudiced scumbags burnt at the stake.

What will happen? Bugger all.

Useless politicians, councillors, NHS managers should all be hounded and shunned by all of us for letting that baby boy die, with a broken back that a useless NHS quack couldn’t spot.

What will happen? Bugger all.

Oh yeah. There will be an “enquiry”. And public servants and others with their snouts in the trough will get plenty of expenses for talking out of their arses about things of which they know nothing. And there will be a report - in three years time.

What will happen then? Bugger all.

Government Lose More Private Data

Once again the government lose data belonging to us. Gordon Brown reckons that human error cannot be overcome. Eh? He serious? He goes on to say that the loss of the Gateway data is a private company’s fault and that it is unacceptable and the contract will be changed. Hmm. What about that plonker up in the geordie heartland of New Labour who lost everybody’s data? Has he had the bullet, his manager been fired , and his, and his? Not likely. Civil Servants never get sacked.

The Data Protection Directive from the European Parliament which is binding on the UK government, and for our protection is honoured more in the breach. And why? Well because the government is the main offender and are so incompetent. Someone should issue a summons under the Data Protection Act 1988 and get their fifty quid. Not much but it’s all we got folks.

Medical Negligence causes the loss of Human Rights and Legal Aid in the UK

The law will soon be accessible only to those who have plenty of spare cash (the upper class, doctors and dentists etc) lawyers, and those who feel confident representing themselves. The Law Society and The Bar Council complain that all of the new legislation that introduces new rights is worthless without representation. The government, via the Telegraph, are letting it be known that it is their opinion that the public oppose human rights. Now this just looks to me like phorm, cctv, identity cards and complete loss of privacy and rights is the real agenda. Of course socialism, or any other social scientism masquerading as political theory, relies fundamentally upon enforcement. Now the British Police are a right wing bunch of racists generally, so the left wing cannot rely on them for support in the same way that the Conservatives did. So, what to do? Oh I know, introduce rights, ridicule the idea of it from the side lines for years, then threaten to introduce more rights. That way we can parade the usual patsies, like Simon Heffer, the Murdochites, and tame High Court Judges (retired) to knock it all. Then we can say that the public agree with all this and withdraw them. But we cannot withdraw from the European Human Rights Convention, and European law is now supreme, subsequent to the European Constitution. So what to do? Oh I know! Stop people going to court.

How?

Well the first obvious thing to do is blame the greedy lawyers and shut down legal aid. Then, just in case there are a few hardy souls who are prepared to challenge the law in front of class prejudiced judges, we will make the costs of losing so high that they will (when they inevitably lose) be made bankrupt. That’ll put everyone off using their courts or their rights at all. So there won’t be any more litigants in person.

But how do you make it so expensive to lose?

The costs rule dummy.

What’s that?

The old common law fix that says costs follow the event. That is, the loser pays.

But that’s fair isn’t it?

Not really, the government set the rates of pay for lawyers. They could easily cap it at say, £35.00 per hour, but it’s more like ten or twenty or even fifty times that for a QC. And the government use lots of them. So what you have is an unholy alliance between the government and the upper class right wing greedy lawyers.

How?

Well the government need the fees to be sky high so that they can say legal aid is too expensive.

Yes but why do that, what’s in it for the government then?

Well, the government are, even now, the main defendants (the ones who get sued) and the Medical profession in the UK is so bad, especially NHS quacks, that they need to stop them all getting sued or they’ll go bust completely. So they fix the pay rates, fix the court rules (with High Court and Court of Appeal and Law Lords’ connivance) and make sure the costs rule stays in place. In the States there is no costs rule so if you lose you just lose your time.

Of course the costs rule itself probably contravenes the right to a fair trial, or indeed the right to rights, but you won’t get a UK lawyer challenging that one. So all anyone will be left with is a small claim, but the limit is set at £5000, and the County Court District Judge can still allocate it to a medium track, which means you pay costs if you lose. The court fees, just to issue anything are hundreds of pounds. And if you do win you’ll be lucky to get more than fifty quid, and even then you won’t get costs for winning.

But costs follow the event don’t they?

Not for you and me mate.

But I would have to spend hours checking the law and researching it all.

Tough luck you’ll get nowt.

But if it goes to a different track, and I lose, I’ll have to pay thousands in costs?

Yes. Not fair is it. And even if you can get a maverick District Judge to award costs you’re capped at £9.00 per hour. Again probably contravenes the Human Rights Act but the judges are as bent as the greedy lawyers.

How?

Well they set the hourly rate.

So it’s because the medical profession is so negligent that we are losing legal aid, will lose our rights and live in a surveillance society?

Yes.

But why protect negligent doctors?

Well, they’re upper class, lots of them marry lawyers, lots of them are related to MPs, indeed many MPs are doctors. That’s why. And that’s why people die of MRSA, get crap medical care and can’t sue doctors who cock it all up. That’s why we’re losing our rights to a fair trial, can’t even get a fair trial and if we get a trial at all we’ll lose and get made bankrupt.

Great.